David - TekTab

I have a small request to make for future updates to IPB (hopefully 3.0.1 :P).

I would like to see the option to change the default post view threshold for members, as discussed here. The default is "Currently viewing all posts", but I would like to be able to change this to a custom threshold of "Hiding all posts below -3 points" by default (or however many points you choose).

This would be a great way for the community to actively moderate topics, by negative voting on unsuitable posts. Once enough negative votes have been made, the post will be hidden. Sort of like "burying" on Digg.

I have a small request to make for future updates to IPB (hopefully 3.0.1 :P).

I would like to see the option to change the default post view threshold for members, as discussed here. The default is "Currently viewing all posts", but I would like to be able to change this to a custom threshold of "Hiding all posts below -3 points" by default (or however many points you choose).

This would be a great way for the community to actively moderate topics, by negative voting on unsuitable posts. Once enough negative votes have been made, the post will be hidden. Sort of like "burying" on Digg.

True, but all you have to do is inform your community about the reputation system and let them know how to use it. The more people use it, the more people that will use it (as they see the numbers next to posts going up). It just has to catch on.

Regardless, that's more of a problem with the reputation system as a whole than my suggestion in particular.

And my post is at 2 points now :P

I have a small request to make for future updates to IPB (hopefully 3.0.1 :P).

I would like to see the option to change the default post view threshold for members, as discussed here. The default is "Currently viewing all posts", but I would like to be able to change this to a custom threshold of "Hiding all posts below -3 points" by default (or however many points you choose).

This would be a great way for the community to actively moderate topics, by negative voting on unsuitable posts. Once enough negative votes have been made, the post will be hidden. Sort of like "burying" on Digg.

I have a small request to make for future updates to IPB (hopefully 3.0.1 :P).

I would like to see the option to change the default post view threshold for members, as discussed here. The default is "Currently viewing all posts", but I would like to be able to change this to a custom threshold of "Hiding all posts below -3 points" by default (or however many points you choose).

This would be a great way for the community to actively moderate topics, by negative voting on unsuitable posts. Once enough negative votes have been made, the post will be hidden. Sort of like "burying" on Digg.

I have a small request to make for future updates to IPB (hopefully 3.0.1 :P).

I would like to see the option to change the default post view threshold for members, as discussed here. The default is "Currently viewing all posts", but I would like to be able to change this to a custom threshold of "Hiding all posts below -3 points" by default (or however many points you choose).

This would be a great way for the community to actively moderate topics, by negative voting on unsuitable posts. Once enough negative votes have been made, the post will be hidden. Sort of like "burying" on Digg.

I have a small request to make for future updates to IPB (hopefully 3.0.1 :P).

I would like to see the option to change the default post view threshold for members, as discussed here. The default is "Currently viewing all posts", but I would like to be able to change this to a custom threshold of "Hiding all posts below -3 points" by default (or however many points you choose).

This would be a great way for the community to actively moderate topics, by negative voting on unsuitable posts. Once enough negative votes have been made, the post will be hidden. Sort of like "burying" on Digg.

haha.

We could say the same thing..

Why Palestine not in the list?

Get over it dude.

Perhaps because somewhere else is already listed as +2:00 GMT like South Africa?
They might not have included every country because it wouldn't have been user friendly? :huh:

Wow, relax.

As EagleHawk mentioned, they can't include every single country or region in the list, it would be huge. As long as the relative timezone is listed, what does it matter? Just change the name of it.