Jump to content

Dolfan23b

Members
  • Posts

    198
  • Joined

 Content Type 

Profiles

Downloads

IPS4 Providers

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Forums

Store

Everything posted by Dolfan23b

  1. Just upgraded to Beta 6 (from fully working Beta 5) and cleared cache and cookies and can't login to the public side of the suite. All I see is the error below: Sorry, there is a problem Something went wrong. Please try again. Error code: EX1146
  2. Cleared cache and cookies and now they're showing up but still can't login. But trying clearing those and see if your issue with the fonts and stuff is fixed like mine was.
  3. I got this now as well. Didn't see it on Beta 5 but now I do on Beta 6 and can't login to the public side of the system.
  4. I agree that would be very nice. My users don't upload a ton of photos so it's not really that big of an issue for me but when they do I would like to try and not limit them on their end with upload and I would like to preserve as much bandwidth on my end when serving those images. But this isn't too big of a deal for my community.
  5. No worries... glad that it's a bug and not an intended feature. Thanks for the update!
  6. Not sure if that's a setting here to disallow un-liking or not but currently with 3.4.x you can like a post and then go back and unlike it, for whatever reason. Just noticed on these forums that once you like a post, it seems you cannot unlike it. Am I missing something?
  7. ​That would be good then. My main desire is to have to keep the end user from having to manually type in BBCode tags like they do now if they want to use mobile. Bold, italic and the like aren't used nearly as much as [ media ] and [ tweet ] (tag I created to display embedded Tweets) tags are so that would certainly satisfy my needs thank you.
  8. ​Is the part in red bold correct? I've been lurking this thread and it seems there's been multiple requests from people to allow unlimited sized photos and to have the system re-size them to the max allowed file size, not to reject the upload if the file is over the max allowed file size.
  9. ​They do in Tapatalk so moving them to the mobile skin would mean I'd want to get rid of Tapatalk. Not to mention only the very basic emoticons work in Tapatalk. And they post a lot of embedded Tweets and we want to be able to have the nice looking embedded Tweet that you get now with 4.0 just by pasting in the link. I assume that (and Youtube videos) would not embed properly with a plain text editor, right?
  10. ​Try tapping into the editor when it loads. That works for me immediately.
  11. ​Oh please don't do that. Then my users will be stuck with Tapatalk and I hate that app.
  12. Oh that's awesome! I'm mainly interested in easy post formatting options for using the mobile skin so I can get my users away from Tapatalk. The easier I can make for them to be able to embed Tweets and have the nice Twitter look, embed Youtube videos and be able to do simple stuff like bold, italic, etc. the better. Thanks @bfarber
  13. ​No issues in Safari either. Posting that right now after clicking about a dozen pages to get here. And I only have 2 bars of LTE so not on Wifi either.
  14. ​Awesome! I assume that's a coming feature then right? Because I installed the beta of pages and it didn't add that option for me, unless I wasn't doing it properly. Thanks for your response though.
  15. I don't see any topics about this here and can't search the preview site but what's the deal with the old special BBCode button that brought up a drop down list of BBCodes for people? Do we have to create a toolbar button for everything we'd possibly want now, instead of having that button? And on the mobile version, how do you choose which ones show up and which ones are hidden based on the size of the browser?
  16. Loads immediately for me with iPhone 5 and Chrome. Typing this response on the phone now.
  17. I posted this on the preview site the day before it got taken down and not sure if there were any responses so just going to ask again, here. First off I love being able to add new blocks to the right hand column and have them in the forums and posts. But I'm wondering if we'll be able to add a blank HTML block so that we can insert ads, widgets, etc. to it? Or even better, can we add blocks from IP.Content to it? This is pretty critical to the design of my site since we're a sports site that features a right hand Twitter roll right now with up-to-date info and rumors and stuff. I also need to be able to choose with member groups can see these types of blocks. Thanks in advance!
  18. Excellent, thank you so much Adriano!
  19. Sorry for the delay in responding... right now it shows I have 14 members viewing the forum and when I browse the forum I see 8 members and 6 guests and 0 anonymous. But on this hook when I click to view the list I'm still only seeing a single listing and that appears to be the 1st user that would show up if the list were sorted alphabetically. Does that help?
  20. Great hook!... but I'm only seeing 1 name listed on the pop up, no matter how many people are viewing the forum. Thoughts? Oh and I am running IP.Board 3.3.0 and using the 3.0.2 version of your hook and just installed for the 1st time today.
  21. That is very interesting! Thank you for testing and as soon as I have time to get this set up I will purchase it and let you know how it works out. Thanks again!
  22. Sorry for the delay but yes I preserve HTML and prefer to have it set to HTML auto linebreak
  23. That would be fantastic, thank you! The most recent article that has that problem is titled "Vecsey: Josh Smith to Boston Celtics trade rumors hold no weight" The URL of the RSS Feed from YardBarker that has that title, which is from today: http://www.yardbarker.com/rss/team/73 The URL of the article when it's imported: http://hawksquawk.ne...hold-no-weight/ And I've attached a combined screenshot of what the Raw article looks like in the browser and then what it looks like when it's imported.
  24. Thank you for the timely and honest response. For my needs, basically importing sports RSS feeds, I've been very pleased with the stock implementation, but the idea of importing into the database from the feed plus hopefully fixing those 2 annoying "bugs" really gets me interested. I will follow this app and see where it goes.
×
×
  • Create New...