Jump to content

Community

MageUK

+Clients
  • Posts

    466
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About MageUK

  • Birthday 11/18/1988

Recent Profile Visitors

11,618 profile views

MageUK's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (7/13)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

54

Reputation

  1. ​ ​Seems to work on 3.4.6 here, can't see any problems.
  2. Agreed, especially the SQL queries.
  3. I know, I was responding to the "what frustrates me?" question. Doesn't have to be a bug to frustrate me.
  4. The fact that when I click the little switch to go to standard mode instead of RTE, it disables all of the BBCode buttons... we won't be updating to 3.2.X until that's fixed.
  5. Let's not let this die so it never gets fixed.
  6. Thing is, even if you use the RTE and NEVER use raw mode, there's no reason not to agree with this change as it doesn't affect you at all. It just seems silly that what was a large convenience for non-RTE users has been removed.
  7. Thought this might interest you as per your tracker issue - http://community.invisionpower.com/topic/342634-bbcode-buttons-for-non-rte/

  8. As per this issue: http://community.invisionpower.com/tracker/issue-32047-post-box-post-editor-editing-mode-disables-formatting-features/ And my issue (should have searched Tracker first, my bad): http://community.invisionpower.com/tracker/issue-32080-bbcode-buttons-disabled-when-rte-off/ Why should these buttons be disabled when the RTE is turned off? All turning RTE off should do is show you the raw formatting of the post, not make it so you have to manually type every BBCode. Needs to be changed in my opinion and it seems posting in the Feedback forum and getting a few agreements is the only way to do it.
  9. At the moment it's possible to disable signatures for a specific group, and also to disable profile editing (which I believe stops them changing their avatar?). This is no good if you want to punish a user abusing their signature/avatar privileges without banning them, unless I've missed an option somewhere here. It would be useful if signature/avatar privileges could be disabled on a per user basis (and perhaps be a part of the warn system). Right now, it's fairly useless for punishing an individual because you have to change their group, and if they're in a lot of primary and secondary groups, you have to remove them from most of those too since permissions stack positively and most of these groups have permission to use a signature/edit their profile.
  10. Didn't know that actually, that is kind of silly - thanks for the info, I'm sure if this option gets added that could be bundled in with this.
  11. Proposing to add a new option so that subforums of a forum can be visible without the topics in the parent forum being visible. It related to this tracker issue, which is marked as not a bug. On our forum personally, it would be useful to have an option to make subforums visible while keeping the topics/posts in the parent hidden.
  12. Maybe add some sort of checkbox above the leave link? Like "Never re-invite me to this conversation"? Unchecked by default of course, so the user would have to check that specifically to be blocked out. And leaving permanently accidentally on something like a phone would be difficult as they'd have to press 2 seperate areas.
  13. Requested that this topic be moved to the feedback forum.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use technologies, such as cookies, to customise content and advertising, to provide social media features and to analyse traffic to the site. We also share information about your use of our site with our trusted social media, advertising and analytics partners. See more about cookies and our Privacy Policy