Jump to content

Tarun

Clients
  • Posts

    876
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Downloads

Release Notes

IPS4 Guides

IPS4 Developer Documentation

Invision Community Blog

Development Blog

Deprecation Tracker

Providers Directory

Forums

Events

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Tarun

  1. While you can close/collapse the entire sidebar, it would be really neat to be able to collapse select items like how you can collapse the forums. Say you didn't want to see Recent Blog Entries but wanted to see Recently Added Topics. Just click the little minus by Recent Blog Entries and collapse it, while still being able to see the rest of the sidebar items.
  2. I believe that part of the concerns stem from this statement: To me, that says those who are Perpetual License holders and are +Active Customers qualify for this new service. At least, that's how it comes across to me. I purchased the Perpetual License as it was the best one available at the time for me. I wouldn't have to worry about staying on top of updates and fees. However, ever since I made my purchase I have opted-in for paying for the $30/year fee for support/etc. Even though I've rarely needed support (three tickets in the three or so years I've had it, two being with IP.Board 3's release) I felt it was the right thing to do by paying the recurring fee. The reason I say this is that it shows I'm an active customer who is continuing to show support for IPS. Sure, paying is optional for support with this license (if you want support) but I also believe it shows appreciation for the products IPS distributes. I believe that if a product is truly of outstanding quality and dependability, then a person should have no issues showing support to the developers financially. A bit long winded but I hope I'm getting my point across. :P
  3. If a perpetual customer is paying their $30/year fee for support, are an +Active Customer and this new spam service is included in that pay fee since it's optional to pay, I'd think that would make the perpetual users happy.
  4. When IP.B3 was alpha I could have sworn people asked for an ajax report feature much like Michael mentions.
  5. Tarun

    IPB RC 2

    Holy crap, codebox tags dude!
  6. Tarun

    Swine flu?

    Do I have swine flu? :lol:
  7. If this doesn't make it in, someone should make a mod for it.
  8. I'd like to see a method to add limits to signatures so that people cannot have huge 800x600 images (cheesy example) in their sigs. Basically something that checks the total number of images including the dimensions, totaling them up to see if they go over a limit, of say 300x100. Though I'm not so sure about how to limit the number of lines of text that are displayed. But I would like the image limit for sigs to be added. :)
×
×
  • Create New...