Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications By Matt November 11, 2024
Carole Asselin Posted January 7 Posted January 7 On a monthly basis, I share a screenshot of the leaders for the previous month. Today, I tried it and I got very inaccurate results. the 3rd member listed has NOT posted in the last month. In fact, that member passed away 2 years ago! the number of posts for December is in the thousands, while the ones for November are more appropriate, in the 200-300 range Is there something that might need to reset (not wanting to go down to 0 of course) or such? I can't put the screenshot as it is given with a deceased member in 3rd position!
Jim M Posted January 7 Posted January 7 You will want to review what you're filtering by in the Leaderboard. The first page of the Leaderboard is reputation (aka what a user gets from reactions). If a topic or content piece has a resurgence, it is completely possible content from 2 years ago or more could be reacted to thus resulting the author appearing on the Leaderboard. Without an example though, I cannot say for certain.
Carole Asselin Posted January 7 Author Posted January 7 (edited) Here is a video of what I get: https://www.loom.com/share/29955d69f8104a059eab15b98703ec7c?sid=4eb25ab3-c2aa-43f1-be7b-15105248ccd4 To me, it is the first time I get such odd numbers. In November the leader has 733 posts while the leader in December has 3400 posts (and it is the same person). That does not make sense. Edited January 7 by Carole Asselin
Jim M Posted January 7 Posted January 7 What you’re looking at there is indeed reputation, not posts so wouldn’t matter when the user posted it but when a user reacted to it.
Carole Asselin Posted January 7 Author Posted January 7 8 minutes ago, Jim M said: What you’re looking at there is indeed reputation, not posts so wouldn’t matter when the user posted it but when a user reacted to it. But why is it so off the chart compared to the previous months? https://www.loom.com/share/4883d165ed294f529cfc59a94889389d?sid=a4c8c017-41d4-4024-82c8-34d6caff28e0
Jim M Posted January 7 Posted January 7 4 minutes ago, Carole Asselin said: But why is it so off the chart compared to the previous months? https://www.loom.com/share/4883d165ed294f529cfc59a94889389d?sid=a4c8c017-41d4-4024-82c8-34d6caff28e0 It’s an accumulation over that span. Somewhere someone might have done more reacting. You would need to review the items listed there.
Carole Asselin Posted January 7 Author Posted January 7 5 minutes ago, Jim M said: It’s an accumulation over that span. Somewhere someone might have done more reacting. I don`t think that explains it: https://www.loom.com/share/9bc284849c304b6fac1691f5507b5239?sid=340e0ef2-0d87-4d0f-84f5-45df54bc0630 Something is wrong for the December stats only. November is correct, and January is correct.
Jim M Posted January 7 Posted January 7 We would need to look further into this for you, however the access details on file appear to be incorrect or missing. Could you please update these details by visiting your client area, selecting the relevant purchase, then clicking "Review/Update Access Information" under the "Stored Access Information" section. We look forward to further assisting you.
Carole Asselin Posted January 7 Author Posted January 7 19 minutes ago, Jim M said: We would need to look further into this for you, however the access details on file appear to be incorrect or missing. Could you please update these details by visiting your client area, selecting the relevant purchase, then clicking "Review/Update Access Information" under the "Stored Access Information" section. I have updated it.
Carole Asselin Posted Tuesday at 08:29 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:29 PM On the top, where I set it for FTP, should it ask for the user/password for the ftp, or for my admin login credentials? I think i had put it wrong. Now?
Jim M Posted Tuesday at 08:42 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:42 PM Yeah, as mentioned, a particular member went a little happy reacting to things. Member ID 4333 reacted to a TON of items in December.
Carole Asselin Posted Tuesday at 08:46 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:46 PM (edited) 4 minutes ago, Jim M said: Yeah, as mentioned, a particular member went a little happy reacting to things. Member ID 4333 reacted to a TON of items in December. Where do you see that? And was the member Jacques? I can't see how to know who it is. If that is who I am thinking, it still does not explain much as he is not even among the leaders in December. And it does not explain why Annie appears as a leader in the last month. Edited Tuesday at 08:48 PM by Carole Asselin
Jim M Posted Tuesday at 08:51 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:51 PM 5 minutes ago, Carole Asselin said: he is not even among the leaders in December. The user who reacts is not the one who shows up. I looked into your database where this information is stored to quickly get it to see if there was an issue or not. The user is Jacques
Carole Asselin Posted Tuesday at 08:54 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:54 PM 1 minute ago, Jim M said: The user who reacts is not the one who shows up. I looked into your database where this information is stored to quickly get it to see if there was an issue or not. The user is Jacques So, the recipient of the reactions gets the points and not the one "reacting"? How would I "filter" for posts and reactions GIVEN (not received)?
Jim M Posted Tuesday at 08:56 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:56 PM 1 minute ago, Carole Asselin said: So, the recipient of the reactions gets the points and not the one "reacting"? How would I "filter" for posts and reactions GIVEN (not received)? Correct. That is not a statistic.
Carole Asselin Posted Tuesday at 08:59 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 08:59 PM So, Annie, appearing in the leaderboard would be due to Jacques reacting to her posts?
Jim M Posted Tuesday at 09:13 PM Posted Tuesday at 09:13 PM 13 minutes ago, Carole Asselin said: So, Annie, appearing in the leaderboard would be due to Jacques reacting to her posts? Correct.
Carole Asselin Posted Tuesday at 09:15 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 09:15 PM Thanks for clarifying that. It does not make sense as in statistics, but at least, there is an explanation.
Recommended Posts