Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications Matt November 11, 2024Nov 11
Posted June 26, 20213 yr I am not using 4.6 yet, but I have a question regarding the new achievements system: Are those ranks connected to group promotions, so that you can use a certain rank as a requirement for a promotion?
June 26, 20213 yr 2 minutes ago, MMXII said: I am not using 4.6 yet, but I have a question regarding the new achievements system: Are those ranks connected to group promotions, so that you can use a certain rank as a requirement for a promotion? nope
June 26, 20213 yr Author 20 minutes ago, Dexter_X said: nope What, really? Why else would you implement achievements, if you cannot use them in order to "award" users with something else than just an icon, e.g. by promoting them to a new user group? Here is my feature suggestion: Please make ranks part of group promotions. Edited June 26, 20213 yr by MMXII Title changed
June 26, 20213 yr I've not yet taken a closer look to that, but maybe you can match the group promotions with some of your achievement rules, so they can be awarded at same time (same conditions)... We've tried to do so with reputation ranks, but a current bug makes it impossible. We're waiting for next version (4.6.3) to get the bug solved and got the match between reputation levels and achievements rules ranking.
June 26, 20213 yr Management We plan to add this feature but wanted to implement base Achievements first to see how people used them. But it will for sure be coming 🙂
June 26, 20213 yr 3 hours ago, Charles said: We plan to add this feature but wanted to implement base Achievements first to see how people used them. But it will for sure be coming 🙂
December 2, 20213 yr The feature is there now, but it does not work. Lets say you set an achievement for when someone posts a comment for the first time, and they get an award for this. then you set up a group promotion for if they have this award, then move them to group, The promotion does not see awards.. even though the option is there. So this is intended to work, but does not work.