Adlago Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 The new activated version of Lighthouse 7.1 reports that all resources from the IPS Suite use only HTTP 1/1 for mobile ... For desktop is OK. Here is a photo from this site ... Please comment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted February 19, 2021 Management Share Posted February 19, 2021 I am not sure what you are referring to. Those are static CSS files served outside of our software's framework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 6 minutes ago, Charles said: I am not sure what you are referring to. Those are static CSS files served outside of our software's framework. OK, see this PSI test and comment please. The test is on your site. View mobile reports. A report on the use of HTTP 2 protocols states that all resources are loaded with the HTTP1.1 protocol for mobile. These reports appear now that Lighthouse has upgraded from 6.x. to 7.1. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Finvisioncommunity.com%2Fforums%2F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted February 19, 2021 Management Share Posted February 19, 2021 Just now, Adlago said: OK, see this PSI test and comment please. The test is on your site. View mobile reports. A report on the use of HTTP 2 protocols states that all resources are loaded with the HTTP1.1 protocol for mobile. These reports appear now that Lighthouse has upgraded from 6.x. to 7.1. https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=https%3A%2F%2Finvisioncommunity.com%2Fforums%2F You often post results from random "speed test" tools but I am not sure what you are suggesting. Those are static CSS files that are not served via Invision Community's code. They are just a text file on an S3 bucket served via CloudFront. Our software has zero control over what happens once it uploads them. I can confirm our CloudFront distribution is set to allow HTTP 2. I have no idea why your testing tool is choosing not to use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 4 minutes ago, Charles said: You often post results from random "speed test" tools but I am not sure what you are suggesting. Those are static CSS files that are not served via Invision Community's code. They are just a text file on an S3 bucket served via CloudFront. Our software has zero control over what happens once it uploads them. I can confirm our CloudFront distribution is set to allow HTTP 2. I have no idea why your testing tool is choosing not to use it. This doesn't just happen with your site. And with different sites, incl. and without the use of cloud ... That's why it's weird ... In the example from your site, loading font awesome is directly from your server Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted February 19, 2021 Management Share Posted February 19, 2021 I have no idea what to tell you 🙂 It's set to allow HTTP 2 on our side. Why the tool is not using HTTP 2 is unknown to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 (edited) I'm also surprised - so far there was no problem. That's why I asked - if you have more reliable information to comment ... thanks Edited February 19, 2021 by Adlago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted February 19, 2021 Management Share Posted February 19, 2021 It is extra-odd that desktop is doing HTTP 2 and mobile is not. I dunno 🤷♂️ Linux-Is-Best 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 This tool does a simulation test with Moto G4 - until version 6.x everything was OK. Now after upgrading to 7.1 this happened ... PP. I did a test with another tool - also a MotoG4 simulation - everything is OK with it. But it's weird anyway - every new version of a tool should be bug-free ... Or Google developers have sunk with protective masks in front of their screens ...😀 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted February 19, 2021 Management Share Posted February 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, Adlago said: every new version of a tool should be bug-free Linux-Is-Best and xtech 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linux-Is-Best Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 22 minutes ago, Adlago said: But it's weird anyway - every new version of a tool should be bug-free e9810942-200d-4b6a-b30a-abc333713c77.mp4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts