Jump to content

Blog RSS feed URL 'missing feed Title'? Is there a workaroun

Recommended Posts

Is this a known issue for one of my newest bloggers?

This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.

  • line 2, column 36: title should not be blank [help]

    <rss version="2.0"><channel><title/><link>https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/ ...
  • line 4, column 7: description should not contain HTML: p [help]

    </p>]]></description><language>en</language><item><title>80% of Covid19 inte ...
  • line 3, column 0: description should not contain ipsnoembed attribute [help]

    	Living life in the present one breath at a time.
  • line 23, column 46: The specified guid is not sufficiently unique: 747 [help]

    ]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">747</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 20 ...
  • line 23, column 110: Missing atom:link with rel="self" [help]

    ... Mar 2020 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>

Source: https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/blogs/blog/rss/121-michael-kreson/

  1. <?xml version="1.0"?>
  2. <rss version="2.0"><channel><title/><link>https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/blogs/blog/121-michael-kreson/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
  3. Living life in the present one breath at a time.
  4. </p>]]></description><language>en</language><item><title>80% of Covid19 intensive care patients are overweight</title><link>https://www.theworldnewsmedia.org/blogs/entry/747-80-of-covid19-intensive-care-patients-are-overweight/</link><description><![CDATA[
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not an issue.

I can't reproduce the title issue testing locally, so it may have been fixed already for 4.5.

We produce an RSS feed, not an ATOM feed, so the notice about atom:link can be ignored.

I don't see any instance of ipsnoembed in the HTML you copied, but that is going to come down to the fact that descriptions accept WYSIWYG content which we are outputting without modifying (the same as the warning about using HTML in descriptions). It is my opinion this can be safely ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...