Adlago Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 If possible, please turn on this 'editing' an option. I've been studying for a few days "Server Response Time". Now there are many tasks that are running at 5,10,15 and 30 minutes. When an execution time of several tasks coincides - a Server response time sharply increases for visitors to a site. This lowers the speed loading site. On my site, I have been very difficult to get away with many of these coincidences - with manual task launch at a different point in time. Now I watch a relatively even server response time in constant monitoring that I use. If you allow editing this frequency, you can easily make the runtime tasks have no match. I would use intervals of 7,13,17,23 and 29 minutes instead of intervals that are multiples of number 5. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BomAle Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 Some ISP limit the email sent on one hour, or for cycle... I need to edit frequency as a lot of clients here EDIT: there are some alert if alter tasks table? EDIT2: the constants not help define('BULK_MAILS_PER_CYCLE', 30); //50 DEFAULT define('NOTIFICATIONS_PER_BATCH', 15); //30 DEFAULT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSystem Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 A more flexible task manager would be great. I currently have to edit directly in the database. E-mail is missing a system of priorities and ease of setting the limit of email submissions per minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted May 22, 2018 Share Posted May 22, 2018 On 11/15/2017 at 3:06 PM, Adlago said: 7,13,17,23 and 29 minutes Prime numbers are your friend here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted May 23, 2018 Author Share Posted May 23, 2018 On 5/22/2018 at 11:53 PM, Aiwa said: Prime numbers are your friend here. I do not see a change - here is the example of 6 task simultaneous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 8 minutes ago, Adlago said: I do not see a change - here is the example of 6 task simultaneous I was agreeing with you... And pointing out all your numbers were Prime numbers. Hence not divisible by any any combination of two of the others. Thus reducing the overlap of task execution. I'm not understanding why you quoted me, with a response that seems like you're pointing out why I'm wrong, when I agreed with you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted May 23, 2018 Author Share Posted May 23, 2018 4 minutes ago, Aiwa said: I was agreeing with you... And pointing out all your numbers were Prime numbers. Hence not divisible by any any combination of two of the others. Thus reducing the overlap of task execution. I'm not understanding why you quoted me, with a response that seems like you're pointing out why I'm wrong, when I agreed with you... Oh no, I did not want you to think I did not agree with you. But I think that this issue should still be the attention of developers constantly. Let them think more. For you only one Thanks and cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.