LDDG Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 Seeing that IP.Content has the capability of creating a new thread everytime a new article is posted, my question is: Is this good or bad for SEO purposes? Do search engines see this as duplicate content and a weak attempt at creating more content on the site, thus probably flagging it as spam? I've always wondered about this... Also, can IPB function without using session IDs within URLs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opentype Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 45 minutes ago, LDDG said: Do search engines see this as duplicate content and a weak attempt at creating more content on the site, thus probably flagging it as spam? I doubt it, but if you worry about it, you can let the posts be created in a forum hidden to guest. But I wouldn’t use the forum-post-from-database-records in 4.x anymore. It has very little use and creates double entries in the activity feed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDDG Posted April 14, 2016 Author Share Posted April 14, 2016 2 hours ago, opentype said: I doubt it, but if you worry about it, you can let the posts be created in a forum hidden to guest. But I wouldn’t use the forum-post-from-database-records in 4.x anymore. It has very little use and creates double entries in the activity feed. Oh I see... That's what I thought. It would be seen duplicate content because they would have the same title. How about the session IDs in the URL? Is there a way not to have that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sudo Posted April 14, 2016 Share Posted April 14, 2016 2 hours ago, LDDG said: How about the session IDs in the URL? Is there a way not to have that? It sounds like your php session cookies are messed up possibly and its tagging it into the url to get around the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.