RevengeFNF Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Because 4.1.9 is now being labelled as a Security Release, is there any time estimation for the release of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesignzShop Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 I guess I'm not seeing where it's being labeled a security release. It's not being labeled that inhttps://community.invisionpower.com/release-notes/ I also notice only about less than 1/4 of updates mentioned is security. It appears to be mostly fixes and a bigger release to boot? Maybe I'm missing something? You do realize what line will come next from someone I decided to leave the obvious out Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sudo Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Just now, DesignzShop said: I guess I'm not seeing where it's being labeled a security release. It's not being labeled that inhttps://community.invisionpower.com/release-notes/ It has the security exclamation mark on my screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Hoilik Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 5 minutes ago, DesignzShop said: I guess I'm not seeing where it's being labeled a security release Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesignzShop Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 By golly I guess there is a little red mark there I'd still doubt anything around weekend time imo. Could happen. Doubt it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted March 3, 2016 Management Share Posted March 3, 2016 We are in QA process on 4.1.9 now. The security updates are not extremely critical so we are not doing them outside of cycle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgin Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Is there a specific reason md5 is still used in the suite? I see the security fixes are for md5 issues. Is that backwards compatibility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marius Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 What exactly is this? Quote The member REST API endpoint will now return custom fields. An example of what does this it would be ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eudemon Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 also interested to know, because one of the bug I need it to be fixed was marked fixed for 4.1.9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel F Posted March 3, 2016 Share Posted March 3, 2016 Just now, Eudemon said: also interested to know, because one of the bug I need it to be fixed was marked fixed for 4.1.9 as charles said, we're already in the QA phase and it shouldn't take that long 4 hours ago, Charles said: We are in QA process Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJ77 Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 This thread on mobile Same error happened on my site on one of my threads. Hope this can be prevented with some kind of fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirill N Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 1 hour ago, superj707 said: This thread on mobile Same error happened on my site on one of my threads. Hope this can be prevented with some kind of fix This is because ZeroHour's post has the following code: <div style="margin-left:1077px;margin-top:56px;"> <div title="Protected by Grammarly"> </div> </div> inserted by the Grammarly plugin. It's happening on my site as well because the plugin is quite popular (2 million users!). I reported that before but IPS said this isn't a bug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opentype Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 36 minutes ago, Kirill N said: inserted by the Grammarly plugin. It's happening on my site as well because the plugin is quite popular (2 million users!). I reported that before but IPS said this isn't a bug. And I would agree. If anything, it’s a bug of Grammarly. It’s not supposed to change the layout of the text it is meant to check for spelling/grammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJ77 Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 Looks like a bug to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirill N Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 14 minutes ago, opentype said: And I would agree. If anything it’s a bug of Grammarly. It’s not supposed to change the layout of the text it is meant to check. Well the suite isn't supposed to allow modifications to the page layout either. Right now, anyone can vandalize a page with that plugin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
opentype Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 The only bullet-proof way around that is to not allow any external rich-text content to go into the editor in the first place. If you do allow it, you will always be able to vandalize a post. That’s not a bug, it is by design. If you allow HTML styling in the post, you will get whatever styling that is. You would need artificial intelligence built in to decide which style statements (e.g. width, margin, padding, color, background-color …) are useful for the post/page and which are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sudo Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 8 hours ago, Kirill N said: This is because ZeroHour's post has the following code: <div style="margin-left:1077px;margin-top:56px;"> <div title="Protected by Grammarly"> </div> </div> inserted by the Grammarly plugin. It's happening on my site as well because the plugin is quite popular (2 million users!). I reported that before but IPS said this isn't a bug. Sneaky %^&%^& I had no idea it was doing that, I have removed the addon now! EDIT: I actually think the way the plugin works is causing the editor to pick up the html rewrites it does for its inserts rather than a tracker blip. Its one of the issues between chrome plugins and a html editor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted March 4, 2016 Share Posted March 4, 2016 17 hours ago, Morgin said: Is there a specific reason md5 is still used in the suite? I see the security fixes are for md5 issues. Is that backwards compatibility? We don't use md5 for passwords or "encrypting" any sensitive information, but we do use it for certain areas where we need a random unique string. 17 hours ago, Marius said: What exactly is this? An example of what does this it would be ideal. It's just a change to the REST API introduced in 4.1.6. Any endpoints which return member data will now include the member's custom profile field values. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MADMAN32395 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 On 3/3/2016 at 0:54 PM, Charles said: We are in QA process on 4.1.9 now. Just a random thought, I see that the current status is set to 'In Development'; wonder if we could get like a 'In QA' or various other statuses? IDK seems like the Dominos Pizza Tracker lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SJ77 Posted March 5, 2016 Share Posted March 5, 2016 On 3/4/2016 at 7:07 AM, Mark said: It's just a change to the REST API introduced in 4.1.6. Any endpoints which return member data will now include the member's custom profile field values. That will be extremely useful. It will be nice to make use of those fields in 3rd party apps etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevengeFNF Posted March 8, 2016 Author Share Posted March 8, 2016 Will 4.1.9 probably be released this week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZakRhyno Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 On 3/7/2016 at 11:57 AM, RevengeFNF said: Will 4.1.9 probably be released this week? Are the week after this post from the week you posted @RevengeFNF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.