Rhett Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 I have been testing IPS4 along the way for speed, using many different configurations, and wanted to share the end results with Beta 6 tonight. Of course this is a clean install, however the numbers are very promising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BomAleold Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/cQs9Yp/community.invisionpower.com67/100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feneroin Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/cQs9Yp/community.invisionpower.com 67/100% He has said "fresh install" and as you can see, he hasn't tested this site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbie LAC Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Hello,Need to compare with previous versions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Everything is achievable. If using cookie-free domains for CSS and JS resources YSlow improves. Here is my test: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted January 29, 2015 Author Share Posted January 29, 2015 Hello, Need to compare with previous versions Here is a test of ips4 beta5 vs 347, same server, same setup, same fresh install for both versions. (apples to apples) I didn't post all of the prior testing, I just wanted to show the great results of beta6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted January 29, 2015 Management Share Posted January 29, 2015 I am sure you enable AWS integration for CDN that would improve more. Not to mention memcache and such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyF Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 FWIW, the time to load, ie initial load with no browser cache on a dialup connection (don't ask!) comparing 34x to 4x, 4x is slightly faster initially to load the forum index so tis all good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobrenome Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Great time to first byte.Do you use apache or nginx? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted January 30, 2015 Author Share Posted January 30, 2015 Those test were done using nginx as a reverse proxy for apache 2.4, php 5.6 with Zend opcache, and mariadb 5.5. I also did the same test using the same configs without nginx and just apache 2.4, there wasn't enough of a difference to matter with normal loads, however under stress testing while also running the performance test at the same time, nginx performed better. Here was the results during the stress test of 200 request per second while also running the performance test. (please note these performance testing sites are not 100% accurate, however it's a decent guide to go by for testing if you use them all and combine the results with some common sense.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makoto Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 I personally don't care for websites like WebPageTest since they're all very finicky on the way they actually perform these tests. For example, the index page on my production forum actually loads in ~0.88 seconds according to WebPageTest, but because of some beacon and analytic scripts that run as delayed Ajax requests in the background, it doesn't recognize the page as being fully loaded until those all fire off and return a response, even though they don't impact actual page load times at all. Have you ever used New Relic Rhett? If you haven't, I think you'll really like the insights it can provide you with. It actually measures the application performance for one thing. Browser performance can vary on so many factors that are almost completely irrelevant to the server software itself. These are the performance metrics over the last 24 hours for one of my production IP.Board 3.4.7 forums to provide an example, It would definitely be nice to see some comparison metrics like this instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted January 30, 2015 Author Share Posted January 30, 2015 I normally don't use any testing sites from third parties, I can tell what sites are doing from the back end and what is quick or not etc, I go by real usage of the site, some people love test site results though, and why I posted these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted February 10, 2015 Share Posted February 10, 2015 Congratulations team of developers for beta 8.In my speed increased by 1%: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Charles Posted February 10, 2015 Management Share Posted February 10, 2015 We do performance improvements every week. It adds up over time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobrenome Posted February 14, 2015 Share Posted February 14, 2015 Any performance improvement under beta 8? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted February 15, 2015 Author Share Posted February 15, 2015 Any performance improvement under beta 8? Yes it bumped up a few notches in performance and scores Look up two posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipy7 Posted February 15, 2015 Share Posted February 15, 2015 Did not even know google chrome had a metric/audit tool until a couple minutes ago while playing around with the developer tools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 RC5 - Several getting better test web: Google Developers: 74/100 mobil and 90/100 desktop Pingdom - 94/100 Webpagetest - Only "AAAA" GTmetrix - 98/100 speed and 90/100 YSlow And also html5 validation: Result: Passed http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fnophelet.com%2Fconsults%2F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warzone Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 RC5: http://385.no - This is no upgrade from 3.4, this is from RC3 and now RC5http://gtmetrix.com/reports/385.no/Lk73hv4fhttp://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/cgZFFa/http://385.no/http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150313_SB_19J4/http://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=http%3A%2F%2F385.no%2FA few minor issues, but...can they be fixed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 Optimize images, including add size to link them loaded.Turn compression and cache, use htaccessUse cookie-free domainsand will improve performance boost your site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warzone Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 Yupp... i have no idea what you just said or how to do these tings in ips4 or in htaccess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adlago Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 How do you - I know two ways.- With much persistence, reading and studying communications.- Quickly and effectively enough cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warzone Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 then ill have a slow site then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makoto Posted March 13, 2015 Share Posted March 13, 2015 RC5: http://385.no - This is no upgrade from 3.4, this is from RC3 and now RC5http://gtmetrix.com/reports/385.no/Lk73hv4fhttp://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/cgZFFa/http://385.no/http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150313_SB_19J4/http://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=http%3A%2F%2F385.no%2FA few minor issues, but...can they be fixed? You don't have gzip compression enabled. There's no excuse for that. Enable it. Seriously.http://www.feedthebot.com/pagespeed/enable-compression.html You can add cache control headers to static resources by adding the following to your .htaccess file, # Cache-Control Headers <ifModule mod_headers.c> <filesMatch ".(ico|jpe?g|png|gif|swf|css|js)$"> Header set Cache-Control "max-age=2592000, public" </filesMatch> </ifModule> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warzone Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 Hm, this is correct right: http://prntscr.com/6gjsm4http://gtmetrix.com/reports/385.no/JIqK6c0Uhttp://www.webpagetest.org/result/150314_S8_A3D/Only left are the image thingy.. Thanks for the link and that code @@Kirito Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.