Aiwa Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Considering the Shoutbox as an example here. Can you imagine the level of support demand a self-hosted chat system would require? IPS would almost have to support configuration at the server level to ensure Chat would function correctly. And with the varying types of server configurations out there that would be a nightmare. IPS hosting Chat ensures the service is stable running on a server that's specifically tailored to run it. Look at IRC, do you host the server? In most cases no, you're connecting to a remote server. Hopefully that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwistedMerlin Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 The chat pricing really isn't that bad. Not to mention that whereas self hosting would be fine for small to medium sites, but imagine it on a large site, with thousands of users, at any given time you could have hundreds of users connecting to it at the same time. Server load, much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocean West Posted October 6, 2014 Author Share Posted October 6, 2014 They can always zend or icon cube the files (like nexus) and bake in some logic that knows the license limits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiwa Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 They can always zend or icon cube the files (like nexus) and bake in some logic that knows the license limits. Sure, they could. But that doesn't chnage the dynamic of ensuring the clients server can run Chat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob. Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Right, but they're the ones providing the infrastructure so that's their prerogative. If it's self hosted, the resources being used are those of the server it's installed on, it has nothing to do with IPB at that point. If they handed it over to a different server, yes they don't have the resources used up...they also don't get any income from it, which is likely why it is likely to remain an IPS hosted product...they use their resources and get an income from it, instead of saving resources but losing the income :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 We do not have any plans to allow self-hosting of IP.Chat. There are third party chat solutions should you feel you require a self-hosted solution. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentnauer Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 We do not have any plans to allow self-hosting of IP.Chat. There are third party chat solutions should you feel you require a self-hosted solution. Thanks for the clarification! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanalWorld Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 IP.Chat will naturally be updated for IPS4, and will see feature improvements too. I can't promise it'll be like a shoutbox though; it'll likely remain as a section of your site that users go to to chat.Glad to hear this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.