Yet Another SEO Suggestion

[Ramiru]

• Different Description Per Page
  Page 1: http://community.invisionpower.com/forum/305-pre-sales-questions/ and Page n: http://community.invisionpower.com/forum/305-pre-sales-questions/page-3?prune_day=100&sort_by=Z-A&sort_key=last_post&topicfilter=all have the same Description. If the Titles for these pages were appended with Page x, can we also do this for Description?
• Link Rel Navigation
  It doesn't respect SEO-friendly URL settings. next, prev and last were attached with:
  

  
  
  ?prune_day=100&sort_by=Z-A&sort_key=last_post&topicfilter=all
  

  even if using the SEO-friendly URL.

[bfarber]

• Link Rel Navigation
  It doesn't respect SEO-friendly URL settings. next, prev and last were attached with:
  

  
  
  ?prune_day=100&sort_by=Z-A&sort_key=last_post&topicfilter=all
  

  even if using the SEO-friendly URL.

Those are query string parameters - they're not intended to be part of the friendly URL. It is better to include parameters that are designed to change sort options and filters as query string parameters rather than trying to force them into the page friendly URL string.

(Granted when the filters are the default values they're not necessary and can be stripped, but that's a different discussion)

[Ramiru]

Is it necessary to be really there? Because when you enter just /page-n only, it returns the correct items anyway.

/page-n is also set as the canonical.

Maybe it's better to have both canonical and navigation in uniform format?

For example, if parameters are required then:

canonical = /page-n?parameters

navigation = /page-n?parameters

or if it can be omitted then:

canonical = /page-n

navigation = /page-n

Anyway,

When implemented incorrectly, such as omitting an expected rel="prev" or rel="next" designation in the series, we'll continue to index the page(s), and rely on our own heuristics to understand your content.

[bfarber]

Is it necessary to be really there? Because when you enter just /page-n only, it returns the correct items anyway.

I'm not in disagreement there, and is what I meant when I said...

(Granted when the filters are the default values they're not necessary and can be stripped, but that's a different discussion)

I just feel that's a different point/discussion than not "respecting SEO friendly URL settings".

[code10]

Hello,

Can somebody help me with this, please.

1) In which template i can modify this url and exluding the search query string parameters?

I only want to make use of "/page-n".

2) Also, is there any possibility to increase the number of thread-views shown i.e. not only 1,2,3,LAST, -> 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,LAST

Thank you!