Jυra Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I figured that the IP. SEO would have had it on release, even tough I wish to have it for non-SEO purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Matt Posted December 15, 2010 Management Share Posted December 15, 2010 This comes up now and again and while we want to add tagging, it's not something we want to throw in over a couple of days. It's also one of those features that's only requested by a small part of our customer base. We do want to add it, but we want to create a good implementation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noni Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I'm also part of that small customer base. This feature could be requested by a few but i'm sure it's useful for many... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Matt Posted December 15, 2010 Management Share Posted December 15, 2010 If implemented properly it can be a good feature. The trouble is that it will need to be a deep implementation that affects a lot of the core (search, display, forum view, topic view, board index, etc). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Wers Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I'm an another part of that small customer base. And I own the biggest forum powered by IP.Board in Slovakia, so I am important part :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike54 Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 If implemented properly it can be a good feature. The trouble is that it will need to be a deep implementation that affects a lot of the core (search, display, forum view, topic view, board index, etc). Matt, I respect that it would take a lot of effort to add a tagging feature to the core. But I have also seen positive results from using tags on that other forum platform. It's one of those things that doesn't present itself as a deal-breaker, but I think it could prove to be a big plus. Then again, the thought of going back and tagging thousands of threads doesn't sound very appealing. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexJ Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I'm also part of that small customer base. Me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikadon Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I'm in the very same boat and I really hope that tagging is included before I launch my newest project in a few months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ørret Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 Going to buy IP.Downloads and IP.Gallery so I'd like this too. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Petrelli Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 Yeah I pretty much suggested this and other things: Allow threads to be tagged with keywords, like a tag cloud and allow tags to be searched. When tags are searched, it will bring up the threads tagged with a specific keyword. I would also like to suggest to allow unique meta descriptions/keywords to be inputted for specific threads, sort of like what Minerva SEO did with their SEO module for IPB 2.3.x. I posted more suggestions in the following thread, although they were for IPB in general as I wasn't aware that there was going to be an IP.Seo app. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neuro Posted December 16, 2010 Share Posted December 16, 2010 I suggested tagging in IP.Content here... it is made for content, after all: :) It sounds like it's in plans, but who who knows when we'll see it - it isn't something you can rush out, as Matt said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.