IPBSupport.de Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 I post now here a new topic, because [url=" no IPS staff answer for month. When import a application it overwrite still all languagepacks. Solution for this big problem: Give us a dropdown when importing a languagepack (application). So we can select the language pack in which we would import the application (or if no one selected create a new languagepack / install the application to all languagepacks). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawPi Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Yes, most important feature for foreign clients! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adriano Faria Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Old story: http://community.invisionpower.com/tracker/issue-22197-import-separated-xml-apps-update-all-language-sets/ The same was repported for 3.0.X family... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amfidiusz-PL Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 That's what we've been really missing... Rep for you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IPBSupport.de Posted June 14, 2010 Author Share Posted June 14, 2010 Think that should be done in a few minutes and we can finally import applications without problems! Ahh, just for the record: When import a Appication to a selected languagepack, the IP.Board should import the DEFAULT values from the application language file to all other (not selected) languagepacks. So we have no problem! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IPBSupport.de Posted June 21, 2010 Author Share Posted June 21, 2010 Hello? :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adriano Faria Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Honestly, I wouldn't expect this before 3.2.0! Who knows... maybe later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali Majrashi Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Honestly, I wouldn't expect this before 3.2.0! Who knows... maybe later. i think they will consider it in v4.1.0.0.0.0.0.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 We know about this suggestion. I didn't have anything to add which is why I didn't reply. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.