brawlyrox Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Ok, will take a backup of my DB and try that sometime soon. Thankies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobertMidd Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 Ok, will take a backup of my DB and try that sometime soon. Thankies. I tried the query last night and it worked fine, so you should be ok but take a backup as you indicate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brawlyrox Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Just had a chance to try this and it doesn't seem to be working. The location field is actually a custom field held in the pfields table so I have changed the SQL code to this:UPDATE ibf_members SET mgroup='26'WHERE id=(SELECT e.member_id FROM ibf_pfields_content e WHERE e.field_4='google') There aren't any error messages, ACP reports that it succesfully runs, but it just doesn't move any members to the usergroup. SELECT * FROM ibf_pfields_content WHERE field_4='google' Returns 3000+ results SELECT * FROM ibf_members WHERE id=(SELECT ibf_pfields_content.member_id FROM ibf_pfields_content WHERE ibf_pfields_content.field_10="143040") Returns an error message saying "Subquery returns more than 1 row". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfarber Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 TrySELECT * FROM ibf_members WHERE id IN(SELECT ibf_pfields_content.member_id FROM ibf_pfields_content WHERE ibf_pfields_content.field_10="143040") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brawlyrox Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Yup, that worked, as did:UPDATE ibf_members SET mgroup='26' WHERE id IN(SELECT ibf_pfields_content.member_id FROM ibf_pfields_content WHERE ibf_pfields_content.field_10="143040") Many thanks bfarber and RobertMidd! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsuma Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 I haven't had any bots since applying 2.3.6. Well, I had three this week. I went an took the IP addresses in my .htaccess file and accounts were created promoting Xrunner. I had to put it back and hope 3.0 will take care of it. S/N: KlaraNovikoffa IP: 91.76.220.19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoo2000 Posted March 23, 2009 Share Posted March 23, 2009 It could very well be a human spammer, paid to post the links. If it is there's no way you can keep them out with a captcha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsuma Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 It could very well be a human spammer, paid to post the links. If it is there's no way you can keep them out with a captcha. It wasn't human (if you can call 'them' that). Humans would leave a "hit" on my third-party tracker and it did not show that IP address in the logs. I've look on other boards and notice the same display name. At least the .htaccess works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wareczek Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 In Poland, we had the same situation on three boards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kissybissy Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Well, I had three this week. I went an took the IP addresses in my .htaccess file and accounts were created promoting Xrunner. I had to put it back and hope 3.0 will take care of it. S/N: KlaraNovikoffa IP: 91.76.220.1 I've got the same KlaraNovikoffa today. Two days ago, I've got a different bot. I do not remember the name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawPi Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Yeah! Someone broke reCaptcha! IPS go to the war. ;] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 There's already a topic about this in the customer lounge :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.