January 28, 2008 in Feedback
I noticed that every time I add a moderator, I go down the list and set every 'no' to 'yes', with the exception of viewing IP addresses which probably won't be an exception soon enough. Maybe I'm to liberal and trusting of my site's moderators, but logically speaking wouldn't it be more likely people will add a moderator than can do everything rather than a moderator that can do nothing? I think everything should be 'yes' by default and administrators should decide what they don't want their moderators to be able to do. It's a small thing, but it sure would save me some time, and I think I'm not alone in this. Anyone else agree/disagree?
also, it would be just dandy if I could add more than one moderator at a time (same settings), and to be able to view/manage subforum moderation from the main manage forums page, and to add moderators to subforums by default. But hey, I'll post those as seperate suggestions another time I guess. One at a time. :P
I actually like it the way it is, although I can see how it might be time-consuming if you want to enable everything. Perhaps there should be links that automatically grant/deny all privileges? That way, it'd be easier and everyone should be happy.
I think it's fine, although would love to see an alternative way which is quicker.
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.
Started 2 hours ago
Started 1 hour ago
Started 3 hours ago