.Ryan Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Lets see what the poll says. I would really personally like it if you could remove ICQ, and add GTalk and a field marked custom. So the user inputs something like xyz IM and adds what ever it is. So that would benifit anybody. See the poll for information, anyone have any ideas to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 There's already a topic about this... http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?showtopic=228779 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auhosj Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Yes but this one collects votes in a cleaner and more organised way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ryan Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 That was my exact point of creating this, to better organize it and have people discuss what they would want. Also so the IPS see the poll, not just a bunch of comments about it. Most people will vote and not bother to post a comment, and thats fine, because the poll shows there idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Hotdogman Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I wouldn't use the gtalk thing because I use my gmail account soley for personal email and I don't hand it out over the internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I think it's a bit too late for that. Highly doubt that it will change. 2.2 is feature locked. The only thing I see changing, at all, is maybe changing "MSN" to "MSN / WLM". And with that most people recognize what MSN means anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Piracy_Is_Evil Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I think we should be able to add and remove them at the click of an option, and have plug-ins for more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 When you say Google Talk, I assume you mean a much broader Jabber ID, which supports Google Talk and a host of other IM services. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ryan Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Thats what I ment, when is the IPS staff going to look @ this anyways. We have a good amount of poll votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millar Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I vote yes for all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antony Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I think we should just make all of the IM fields custom fields rather than having them built into the board. (As i have said many many times. :'() Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Management Matt Posted October 25, 2006 Management Share Posted October 25, 2006 At some point we're going to drop all 'fixed' messenger fields and go for a custom field system so you can add and remove as many as you like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elj Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Great news. :D 3.0 for that as it's a new feature then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnightmadness Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 I dont use Icq so its makes no difference to me I do have Msn but I dont enter that info only my friends have it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HDTV Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 At some point we're going to drop all 'fixed' messenger fields and go for a custom field system so you can add and remove as many as you like.good many topic talk about this option :thumbsup: http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?showtopic=228665 :whistle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Buzzo Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 At some point we're going to drop all 'fixed' messenger fields and go for a custom field system so you can add and remove as many as you like.woot! :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myr Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 At some point we're going to drop all 'fixed' messenger fields and go for a custom field system so you can add and remove as many as you like.Matt, that is exactly what I'd love to see. Precise admin control over all fields in the profile. Also, dictating where they go would be nice too.Myr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.KX Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 That's great to hear Matt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Great news. :D 3.0 for that as it's a new feature then?That seems most likely to me, but there could always be a 2.3 release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.KX Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Or a 2.4 or a 2.5 or a 2.6 or a *shot*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quillz Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Great news. :D 3.0 for that as it's a new feature then?That seems most likely to me, but there could always be a 2.3 release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmanns Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 At some point we're going to drop all 'fixed' messenger fields and go for a custom field system so you can add and remove as many as you like.Just do it now (w00t) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.KX Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Just do it now w00t.gifBe patient my child... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 IIRC, it is going to be 3.0 after 2.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ryan Posted October 25, 2006 Share Posted October 25, 2006 Matt, I like the idea you said, why not just do it in the final release of 2.2 So when we get the final one, why not have that in already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.