Invision Community 4: SEO, prepare for v5 and dormant account notifications Matt November 11, 2024Nov 11
Posted October 3, 200618 yr The following features have been added or enhanced since the first 2.2 Announcement:Multiple bugs fixed that were reported from Public Beta 1First version of 2.1.7 to 2.2 upgrade routine is included.Ability for a moderator to leave a reason when they edit a post.Administrator can leave a note for other admins when banning a member.Redesigned Quick Edit and Fast Reply editorsWhy isn't that function available for everyone? When my users edit there posts they (most of the time) add an extra line with "Edit: The reason" just to clarify the changes. It would be great if there's always an extra field to add the reason and with an option in the admincp to make it oblige (or not).I don't think I'm the only one who likes such a small change! :)
October 3, 200618 yr because its a mod featuer not a member feature a member can state why they edited their post in the post.
October 3, 200618 yr Offcourse, but an extra line inside the line "This post has been edited by Jorim: zo 10 september 2006 om 16:15 uur" like "This post has been edited by Jorim: zo 10 september 2006 om 16:15 uur. Reason: Because I'd like to edit" would be very straightforward. There will be a mod that will fix it, but why don't include it? It's very annoying that people change there post en you won't know of they just fix some typo's or change there hole story!
October 3, 200618 yr Yes but whats the poing in the member having it if they can state why they edited their own post. This extra link gives you the mods name and why the topic was edited
October 3, 200618 yr Because it is more organized when it's in the same line! (and it's small without bbcoding and won't be annoying when people want to type it in red or something like that)
October 3, 200618 yr I would have to agree, a member should be able to tell why they edited their post ( optional ), not like other bulletin boards don't already do this.
October 3, 200618 yr I disagree...they can do so in thier post..why should we make them do one more thing after editing...the whole posting experience is supposed to be easy not made more difficult. :whistle:
October 3, 200618 yr because its a mod featuer not a member feature a member can state why they edited their post in the post.And a moderator can't?
October 3, 200618 yr Agreed. Would also like the edit by line and reson on the same line.... Right now the reason is all styled in a special box... Who cares about the box? Just add the two together :whistle:
October 4, 200618 yr There should be a feature to allow only moderators/admins to view the "edited by" legend.
October 4, 200618 yr Now that I tried this, I see they did distinguish the reason from the post. Someone can simply move the edited by statement into that background and have it above the reason. That is what I will do if IPS doesnt do it themselves.
October 4, 200618 yr I agree that the ability to leave a reason for editing a post should become a user group feature, and not just something for staff members.
October 4, 200618 yr yeah, user group setting, and in my opinion both in that background rectangle thingy.
October 4, 200618 yr I rather have the edited by part under the siggy and the reason under the postThe edited part is part of the post so it should be in the posting area. The sig part should always be te last part of the post. So I don't agree
October 4, 200618 yr The edited part is part of the post so it should be in the posting area. The sig part should always be te last part of the post. So I don't agreeI agree with you. :thumbsup: I happen to think the reason for editing looks great in its own seperate box, as it is now.
October 4, 200618 yr The sig part should always be te last part of the post. So I don't agreeTotally agree with that :thumbsup:
October 4, 200618 yr Community Expert Management The reason that it's not available for members is to prevent member's from deleting the reason.(And please don't ask for an option to make it so that either members or moderators can only edit the line).If a member makes a post edit, they can put it in the actual post.
October 4, 200618 yr The reason that it's not available for members is to prevent member's from deleting the reason.(And please don't ask for an option to make it so that either members or moderators can only edit the line).If a member makes a post edit, they can put it in the actual post....And so can moderators. Why can't it be a user group setting? That way, you can only assign it to "promoted" user groups if you want, those that can be trusted.
October 4, 200618 yr The reason that it's not available for members is to prevent member's from deleting the reason.(And please don't ask for an option to make it so that either members or moderators can only edit the line).If a member makes a post edit, they can put it in the actual post.Why not disallow them to remove reason after they write it? :thumbsup:
October 4, 200618 yr Community Expert Management (And please don't ask for an option to make it so that either members or moderators can only edit the line).
October 4, 200618 yr The reason that it's not available for members is to prevent member's from deleting the reason.(And please don't ask for an option to make it so that either members or moderators can only edit the line).If a member makes a post edit, they can put it in the actual post.You've got a point with that, but why don't separate the box? I guess that the editing reason from a moderator won't be displayed in the reason line (or maybe it will, but you can separate it from the user-reason).So don't make this moderator function for users, but give users the same function!
October 4, 200618 yr I don't see why members need to show the reason for editing, its their post they know why they edited it. No other members really need to know why and if they do need to know for whatever reason they can put it in their post.Moderators however edit someone elses post, which can confuse the user and with a reason for editing it sorts that out.
October 4, 200618 yr There is actually a modification for that anyway....though I really don't see the point! :rolleyes:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.