Gogf Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 On my test forum, I have no idea how to change the autoresizing size in signatures. My signature, which is 550x150 is automatically resized. Similarly, how to I set the size at which images in posts are resized? Is this an option, or does IPB just use an arbitrary amount that cannot be changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Prowler Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 I would also like to know about the signitures only shown once per topic I read about in the feature description for 2.2. I can't find this anywhere in the ACP. :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZainZ Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 I would also like to know about the signitures only shown once per topic I read about in the feature description for 2.2. I can't find this anywhere in the ACP. :unsure:Correct me if i'm wrong but I think the point in the feature's list meant that they're INTERNALLY parsed only once ^o).10. Member signatures only parsed once per page load in a topic now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Correct me if i'm wrong but I think the point in the feature's list meant that they're INTERNALLY parsed only once ^o).That is correct. In previous the previous version custom bbcode was processed more than once on the same signature. The change caches the signature using the member ID so it isn't processed twice, but still prints it normally. Definitely was an internal change :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gogf Posted October 1, 2006 Share Posted October 1, 2006 BUMP!Is this even possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinistra Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 from the looks of it the sig image resize is based on the image tags. altho it would be a good idea to see it put into IPB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Barrie Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 from the looks of it the sig image resize is based on the image tags. altho it would be a good idea to see it put into IPBThat made absolutely no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinistra Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 That made absolutely no sense.wow someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning is it just me your biting the head off of or is it everyone? Look its a simle answer to a simple question. Asking "On my test forum, I have no idea how to change the autoresizing size in signatures. My signature, which is 550x150 is automatically resized. Similarly, how to I set the size at which images in posts are resized? Is this an option, or does IPB just use an arbitrary amount that cannot be changed?" if you would get your head out of the clouds for a bit and understand that its a thumbail issue using the image resize of IPB you would have understood what I was saying.and do answer your question there isn't a setting to set sig limit resize. its all based on how you allow uploaded images to be posted in thumbnail size Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mat Barrie Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 wow someone got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning is it just me your biting the head off of or is it everyone? Look its a simle answer to a simple question. Asking "On my test forum, I have no idea how to change the autoresizing size in signatures. My signature, which is 550x150 is automatically resized. Similarly, how to I set the size at which images in posts are resized? Is this an option, or does IPB just use an arbitrary amount that cannot be changed?" if you would get your head out of the clouds for a bit and understand that its a thumbail issue using the image resize of IPB you would have understood what I was saying.No, I dislike posts that make no sense. I believe your response was "from the looks of it the sig image resize is based on the image tags. altho it would be a good idea to see it put into IPB"Analyzing this specifically, "from the looks of it the sig image resize is based on the image tags" - well, that would be obvious, there is only one way to insert an image in a page. I can't quite tell what your statement was meant to MEAN."altho it would be a good idea to see it put into IPB" - see what put into IPB? Resizing? No, that's clearly there - annoying though it may be.Context is king, and you applied none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinistra Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 No, I dislike posts that make no sense. I believe your response was "from the looks of it the sig image resize is based on the image tags. altho it would be a good idea to see it put into IPB"Analyzing this specifically, "from the looks of it the sig image resize is based on the image tags" - well, that would be obvious, there is only one way to insert an image in a page. I can't quite tell what your statement was meant to MEAN."altho it would be a good idea to see it put into IPB" - see what put into IPB? Resizing? No, that's clearly there - annoying though it may be.Context is king, and you applied none.I said :from the looks of his sig here that its based off the thumbnail image size." Then I stated " It would be a good feature to have a sig limit structure on IPB" But according to you in one of my other posts "We don't need Pointless Settings" So end of discussions thanks for the sub par intelligent discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root0101 Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I said :from the looks of his sig here that its based off the thumbnail image size." Then I stated " It would be a good feature to have a sig limit structure on IPB" But according to you in one of my other posts "We don't need Pointless Settings" So end of discussions thanks for the sub par intelligent discussionI am having a hard time understanding your post sometimes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sinistra Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 I have issues with typing sorry. I will try to put more umph in my next posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theclub Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 ... is it just me your biting the head off of or is it everyone? It's everyone. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gogf Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Would it be possible to divorce this setting from the thumbnail size? I don't want a huge thumbnail size, and I also don't want every image larger than 400px to be resized. It doesn't really make a whole lot of sense for two totally different features to be linked like this. I REALLY hope that we're able to set these differently in the final version :(.EDIT: Um, by the thumbnail, I assume you mean the image upload thumbnail. Images that are larger than the size you have set for uploaded thumbnails are automatically resized. Is that correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Prowler Posted October 2, 2006 Share Posted October 2, 2006 Correct me if i'm wrong but I think the point in the feature's list meant that they're INTERNALLY parsed only once ^o).I have no idea that's why I asked! :lol: That is correct. In previous the previous version custom bbcode was processed more than once on the same signature. The change caches the signature using the member ID so it isn't processed twice, but still prints it normally. Definitely was an internal change :)So it just effects database load and not actually limiting posters to one siigniture per person in topic? :unsure: I guess I'll have to reinstall the mod for this purpose after 2.2 comes out. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LE_TALLEC Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 delete... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.