Jump to content

Blind Moderator = impossible


Guest cowudders

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a blind user of my forum who I have made a moderator. However, she is unable to do anything as the little tick boxes in the posts are all images, so she cannot tell if the boxes are checked or not.

IMHO the images serve no real purpose, and it would actually be clearer to sighted users too. A simple HTML based check box, something like:

<form method="post" action="post.asp">


<input type="checkbox" name="Check Box" value="moo">Moo<br>


would be all that is required. This would make it very clear which topics were selected, and would be compatible with computer speech sythesis software, thus enabling blind users to be moderators too.

This is very annoying, and she feels alienated by this. This should be a really simple piece of code to fix.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like a skinning matter. Probably would require some code tweaking (so perhaps included for v3.0?), but the skin would be a major part of the change. This would be nice, even for those who can see but maybe prefer assistance.

+1 on this one. (This would be something to give it an edge on other forums too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,



I have a blind user of my forum who I have made a moderator. However, she is unable to do anything as the little tick boxes in the posts are all images, so she cannot tell if the boxes are checked or not.



IMHO the images serve no real purpose, and it would actually be clearer to sighted users too. A simple HTML based check box, something like:



would be all that is required. This would make it very clear which topics were selected, and would be compatible with computer speech sythesis software, thus enabling blind users to be moderators too.



This is very annoying, and she feels alienated by this. This should be a really simple piece of code to fix.



Not that this shouldn't be fixed by IPS. But it shouldn't be too hard to do yourself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admins shouldn't have to make modifications to make their forums accessible. The software should be written to account for older folks and those with disabilities. It shoud also account for those who choose to turn off javascript in their browser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blind users have readers, so Id assume the reader could say checked, or something like that as opposed to image or nothing.


Yep, the speech software reads the bit of text before it, then says "check box not checked" or "check box checked".

Here's a link to the software she uses, just for interest:
http://www.freedomscientific.com/fs_produc...ftware_jaws.asp

She gets along fine with most things, but the reader just says "*" for where the images are, so she has no way of telling if the item is selected or not. I will probably experiment with the alt text or the title text, if I can find the right bit in the code...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about the skin - it should be fixable through that, but I really agree with what cojo said: "Admins shouldn't have to make modifications to make their forums accessible."

That's far too true. We pay IPB to do stuff like that for us - to come up with a good, accessible product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point is that someone could make a skin that is aimed for those who are blind (either legally or literally). Perhaps make it watered down on the features(format not availability) and some things be slightly bigger to be easier to find. Those little boxes I bet would be a nightmare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not go into the Macros and insert alt text?


Or text period?



As an interim measure, yep, that's what I plan to do. Just one question: How do you edit the macros? :)
I'm hapopy editing the skins - or do you mean the variables in the various bits of the skins?

No response from IPB themselves yet... :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admins shouldn't have to make modifications to make their forums accessible. The software should be written to account for older folks and those with disabilities. It shoud also account for those who choose to turn off javascript in their browser.



I don't dispute this, but in the mean time it is fairly simple for him to make the changes himself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...